1/25/2024 0 Comments Brave browser vs firefoxToday, it’s dropped dramatically to under 3%.īrave’s market share is much smaller than that with a mere 0.05% using it on desktop. In 2010, roughly 30% of internet users browsed with Firefox. I would love to use Brave (being a true FOSS project) if these issues are addressed and if enhanced privacy becomes a reality instead of a promise.First released in 2004, Firefox has long been an alternative for people who want to venture beyond the obvious web browser choices.įirefox was once a popular browser, but its user base has largely moved on. Sorry if this was too long, and I’m 100% open to being corrected if I missed anything. In my experience, the only thing that Brave provides (as of the time of this post) is the illusion of privacy. I mean it’s not terrible, it’s just no better than anything that’s not edge, chrome, or opera. Now, I’m not saying everyone needs the level of privacy provided by librewolf or mull, and I will admit that brave does admirably when it comes to speed and performance (beats Vivaldi by a small margin) but I think most people use Brave because it promises enhanced privacy, and on this front it doesn’t seem that brave delivers at all. Hardened Firefox handily beats brave in every privacy category. The summary is, when it comes to privacy, Brave didn’t do better than Vivaldi in any of my tests, actually it did worse in several key areas. I could keep going on but I don’t wanna make this thread too long. Vivaldi fails this test even in incognito mode. In hardened Firefox, clearing cookies or using incognito mode tricks the website into thinking it’s someone else using a different browser and generating a new fingerprint string. This fingerprint is linked to you and changes if the website fails to accurately id and fingerprint your browser. Next, I went to (they have the strongest fingerprinting implemention in my experience) and scrolled down to their live demo to check their generated fingerprint. Vivaldi isn’t nearly as flexible here, but even Vivaldi spoofed chromium engine iteration in my testing. Hardened Firefox lets you completely spoof this information by modifying settings in about:config and using an add-on like chameleon. Also, if you click on fingerprint analysis in the same page, you’ll see that brave doesn’t hide anything about the platform or browser you’re using. If you go to /analyzer and then click on user accounts, you’ll see that brave leaks the types of accounts you’re logged in to (Google, yahoo, Facebook, etc). The browser failed even the most basic privacy tests. Vivaldi is also extremely good when it comes to security, with synced data being end to end encrypted with a password that you set yourself.īrave performed worse than any of the above in my testing. You get the performance and speed advantages of chromium with solid ad blocking and tracking prevention and basic fingerprinting resistance. Then you have somewhat private browsers like Vivaldi. Most websites are optimized for chromium and some don’t behave well in a Firefox based browser, Firefox is significantly slower and performs worse than chromium based browsers especially on Android (Firefox Android is very poorly made), and Firefox doesn’t even support 120hz on Android. Hardened Firefox browsers (librewolf on desktops, mull on Android) are the top tier but they require huge sacrifices when it comes to convenience. Now there are several tiers of browsers when it comes to privacy. I used the most hardened security and privacy settings, including disabling 3rd party and cross-site cookies, the strictest ad blocking and tracking prevention, even webrtc over UDP etc. I been testing brave for a few hours and it seems the “enhanced privacy” promises hold almost no water whatsoever. I have to begin by saying that feedback presents an opportunity for improvement, hopefully this won’t be taken as an insult.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |